
Gifting Made Simple
Give the Gift of ChoiceClick below to purchase a Bramalea City Centre eGift Card that can be used at participating retailers at Bramalea City Centre.Purchase HereHome
Trial, Error, and Disappointment: Davis v. Goliath
Coles
Loading Inventory...
Trial, Error, and Disappointment: Davis v. Goliath in Brampton, ON
Current price: $54.95

Coles
Trial, Error, and Disappointment: Davis v. Goliath in Brampton, ON
Current price: $54.95
Loading Inventory...
Size: Paperback
*Product information and pricing may vary - to confirm current pricing, availability, shipping, and return information please contact Coles. In the event of a pricing discrepancy, the retailer's price will apply.
About the Book Trial, Error, and Disappointment: Davis v. Goliath is about home ownership and the authors legal battle with their residential mortgage company. What makes the story interesting is that during their attempt to raise funds for legal fees, the author fell into a trap involving a well-structured scam. What makes this message relevant is that many were victims of the housing and financial crisis of 2007 while others are taken advantage of by scammers. What makes this book unique is the authors choosing to openly document their plight with both experiences, recognizing that others have experienced same. The author would like readers to connect with their story, recognizing that our courts are "courts of laws" and not necessarily "courts of morals". Imagine that!
About the Book Trial, Error, and Disappointment: Davis v. Goliath is about home ownership and the authors legal battle with their residential mortgage company. What makes the story interesting is that during their attempt to raise funds for legal fees, the author fell into a trap involving a well-structured scam. What makes this message relevant is that many were victims of the housing and financial crisis of 2007 while others are taken advantage of by scammers. What makes this book unique is the authors choosing to openly document their plight with both experiences, recognizing that others have experienced same. The author would like readers to connect with their story, recognizing that our courts are "courts of laws" and not necessarily "courts of morals". Imagine that!





















