
Gifting Made Simple
Give the Gift of ChoiceClick below to purchase a Bramalea City Centre eGift Card that can be used at participating retailers at Bramalea City Centre.Purchase HereHome
Legal Dissonance: The Interaction Of Criminal Law And Customary Law In Papua New Guinea
Coles
Loading Inventory...
Legal Dissonance: The Interaction Of Criminal Law And Customary Law In Papua New Guinea in Brampton, ON
By None
Current price: $175.99

Coles
Legal Dissonance: The Interaction Of Criminal Law And Customary Law In Papua New Guinea in Brampton, ON
By None
Current price: $175.99
Loading Inventory...
Size: Library Binding
*Product information and pricing may vary - to confirm current pricing, availability, shipping, and return information please contact Coles. In the event of a pricing discrepancy, the retailer's price will apply.
Papua New Guinea’s two most powerful legal orders — customary law and state law —undermine one another in criminal matters. This phenomenon, called legal dissonance, partly explains the low level of personal security found in many parts of the country. This book demonstrates that a lack of coordination in the punishing of wrong behavior is both problematic for legal orders themselves and for those who are subject to such legal phenomena Legal dissonance can lead to behavior being simultaneously promoted by one legal order and punished by the other, leading to injustice, and, perhaps more importantly, undermining the ability of both legal orders to deter wrongdoing.
Papua New Guinea’s two most powerful legal orders — customary law and state law —undermine one another in criminal matters. This phenomenon, called legal dissonance, partly explains the low level of personal security found in many parts of the country. This book demonstrates that a lack of coordination in the punishing of wrong behavior is both problematic for legal orders themselves and for those who are subject to such legal phenomena Legal dissonance can lead to behavior being simultaneously promoted by one legal order and punished by the other, leading to injustice, and, perhaps more importantly, undermining the ability of both legal orders to deter wrongdoing.





















